64-bit python build
Christos TZOTZIOY Georgiou
DLNXPEGFQVEB at spammotel.com
Wed Aug 28 11:37:59 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Aug 28 11:37:59 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): 64-bit python build
- Next message (by thread): 64-bit python build
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:51:19 -0400, rumours say that Tim Peters <tim.one at comcast.net> might have written: >[Christos TZOTZIOY] >I wouldn't bother. The most important thing to note on SGI boxes is that >there's a history of (C) compiler optimization bugs nearly as long as >Python's history. If you're using an SGI compiler, and don't want to spend >a lot of time chasing compiler bugs, you're best off disabling optimization >entirely when building Python. I agree to that from my own experience with other old projects too. Just a note for other people building python themselves on SGI boxes: MIPSPro 7.3 seems to compile python fine with -O3 enabled. Floating point accuracy doesn't seem to be influenced, but there is always the -OPT:roundoff=0:IEEE_arithmetic=0 option. >> but I got a Bus Error in test_struct ("trying: xcbhilfd"). >That smells like a compiler optimization bug; the SGI compiler seems prone >to lifting reads above tests guarding the legality of reads. Actually, there were many assumptions in structmodule.c about char pointers being suitably aligned for ints and longs; MIPS 64-bit CPUs are not very forgiving. See at end for patch info. >Sure! Open source is driven by volunteers scratching their own itches -- if >you don't, who will? See SF patch 601369 :) Hopefully this can also be used for IA64 et al. -- TZOTZIOY, I speak England very best, Real email address: 'dHpvdEBzaWwtdGVjLmdy\n'.decode('base64')
- Previous message (by thread): 64-bit python build
- Next message (by thread): 64-bit python build
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list