Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
Patrick W
patrickw106 at yahoo.com.au
Sun Dec 1 19:05:29 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Dec 1 19:05:29 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Next message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
maney at pobox.com writes: > examples) and it may be considerable. Lisp is, if not unique, still > unusual in that it has a second speed bump, because its syntax is > extremely awkward to deal with until you've acclimated to a suitable > IDE or syntax-aware editor. This conceptually unnecessary additional > barrier to entry must surely help hold down the rate at which new > converts make it through to become happy Lisp users. You imply that a struggle with Lisp's syntax is inevitable for newbies, but that definitely was *not* the case for me. I came to Lisp from C, C++, Eiffel, Delphi and a few other languages that bear not the slightest resemblance to Lisp. From day one, Lisp's syntax seemed simple and straightforward; I never found it awkward at all, let alone "extremely awkward". On the contrary, it 'felt' frictionless to my mind, quite unlike other languages I've learned. What I find hard to understand is why anybody finds s-expressions a conceptual challenge. If I hadn't seen evidence to the contrary, I'd believe that anyone who can't grok s-expressions in a day is just too stupid to program *anything*.
- Previous message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Next message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list