Python's popularity statistics
Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters
mertz at gnosis.cx
Mon Dec 16 14:00:04 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 16 14:00:04 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Python's popularity statistics
- Next message (by thread): Python's popularity statistics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aaron K. Johnson <akjmicro at yahoo.com> wrote previously: |We could safely assume from the law of large numbers that a |fairly accurate estimate of the relative (no absolute number is ever possible) |user base of each language could be established from that, no? Unless you |somehow think that different languages for some reason have different likely |percentage of users to posters.... OF COURSE wildely different percentages of users of different langugages will be posters. It could hardly be otherwise. Just as some extreme examples: - Logo is designed largely to teach programming to children. Not very many of them will post. Some of their teachers probably will, but the poster/user ratio is almost certainly lower. - Cobol has a very high long-term/new user ratio. I think it is quite likely that long-term users of a language like Cobol will not post as often. Long-term pythoneers -do- post, but the nature of the language and the discussion about it is different in a way that makes this make sense. - Visual Basic/C## are MS-proprietary technologies (close enough for this point; I know about Mono, RealBASIC, etc) that have some discussion areas run by MS. When discussion is directed to places other than Usenet the poster/user ratio on Usenet is lower. - A very new/experimental language will have almost all the users as posters. Something rough enough around the edges, or just sufficiently academically sophisticated, will require a level of involvement and expertise beyond "normal" languages. And so on. Now it MIGHT be the case that the ratios are fairly consistent between say, Java, C, C++, Perl, Python, Ruby. None of those are "special" in the ways I listed. But it is not obvious that smaller, but systematic, posting-ratio differences do not exist in this set. Yours, Lulu... -- _/_/_/ THIS MESSAGE WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY: Postmodern Enterprises _/_/_/ _/_/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[mertz at gnosis.cx]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _/_/ _/_/ The opinions expressed here must be those of my employer... _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Surely you don't think that *I* believe them! _/_/
- Previous message (by thread): Python's popularity statistics
- Next message (by thread): Python's popularity statistics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list