Python vs Java garbage collection?
Isaac To
kkto at csis.hku.hk
Mon Dec 30 00:18:44 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 30 00:18:44 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs Java garbage collection?
- Next message (by thread): Python vs Java garbage collection?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> writes: Stuart> Can you think of a way to register a function to get called when Stuart> the current block exits? If so, then it is pretty Stuart> straightforward to implement the proposal in pure python. The Stuart> auto function simply adds the object to a list, and the block Stuart> exit function calls the cleanup function for objects in the list Stuart> with all the appropriate try..finally wrappers. Perhaps no need to do it in the block level. After all, there is no block-level variables in Python either. (Even "[a+1 for a in [1]]" leaves a local variable a in the function.) It might be simpler if variable management is done when function, class and file scope exits. Stuart> Actually, you would want to register a function for the calling Stuart> block, or perhaps an arbitrary stack frame. It would also help Stuart> to be able to retrieve the current callable object for a frame Stuart> to make the system thread-safe. No comment, since I don't quite understand this. Stuart> I can't see anyway around having to patch the interpreter to get Stuart> the hook in there. And I think the compiler needs to be Stuart> involved to cleanup at block exit (instead of function exit). Yes, any way to mimic that without modifying the language itself would lead to ugly code. So I ask about a PEP. Regards, Isaac.
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs Java garbage collection?
- Next message (by thread): Python vs Java garbage collection?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list