12 years of Python and only at v2.2
Gonçalo Rodrigues
op73418 at mail.telepac.pt
Fri Dec 6 09:51:38 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Dec 6 09:51:38 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Next message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:16:56 -0800, Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> wrote: >Tim Peters wrote: > >> That is, you don't need reals, you just need lexicographic ordering on >> tuples. > >Oh, of course. I was speaking of the rigorous mathematical case, where >you'd have to define a mapping into the reals. In mathematics, you >don't even have orderings defined over n-tuples, much less m- and >n-tuples, where m != n. Even Python tips its hat to this fact, since >doing ordering comparisons on complex numbers raises an exception. Sorry for nitpicking, but assuming ZFC *every* nonempty set can be well-ordered. The question is, as always, if that order relation is useful for anything. It is hard to imagine such a well order in the complex numbers, though... > >I was speaking abstractly about mathematics, not about Python. With my best regards, G. Rodrigues
- Previous message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Next message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list