Wet Dream--python to native compiler
Andreas Ulbrich
ulbi at ivs.tu-berlin.de
Thu Dec 12 06:23:31 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 12 06:23:31 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Wet Dream--python to native compiler
- Next message (by thread): Wet Dream--python to native compiler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aaron K. Johnson wrote: > Has anyone used Psycho or Pyrex enough to critique/recommend it? > > What are the technical reasons for the difficulty of having a native code > compiler similar to what certain implementations of Lisp enjoy? > > Thanks, > Aaron. I use pyrex a lot for extending and especially embedding. It's great and it's ease to use. I do run a couple of regex over the generated header files to avoid warnings when compiling against our C++ application, but one doesn't need to do this. The generated C code contains a couple of unused labels and variables that produce warnings when compiled, though. But that's not really a problem. As I said: It's great.
- Previous message (by thread): Wet Dream--python to native compiler
- Next message (by thread): Wet Dream--python to native compiler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list