12 years of Python and only at v2.2
Manuel M. Garcia
mgarcia at cole-switches.com
Tue Dec 3 19:53:06 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Dec 3 19:53:06 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Next message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 23:03:14 +0000 (UTC), John Goerzen <jgoerzen at complete.org> wrote: (edit) >I think the notion that any insight into the code itself can be gained by a >version number alone is generally fallacious, save perhaps for the ability >to determine how many marketroids are involved :-) Yeah, I agree. It was the first time I ever saw a low version number given as a "selling point", so it got me to thinking if it is really unusual. I think Linux, Python, GCC have relatively low version numbers considering their age and that none of them are "closed" to new features. But it is true this only gives insight into the "marketing" of new versions. Manuel
- Previous message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Next message (by thread): 12 years of Python and only at v2.2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list