Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
brueckd at tbye.com
brueckd at tbye.com
Fri Feb 1 15:51:42 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 1 15:51:42 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Code Reviews (was: Defending the Python lanuage...)
- Next message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Anders Dahlberg wrote: > > <brueckd at tbye.com> skrev i meddelandet > news:mailman.1012587303.30347.python-list at python.org... > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Anders Dahlberg wrote: > > > > > could re-run them without it. Maybe the low number of replies > is > > > because it's not suprising that a semi-compiled-to-native program is > > > > faster? > > > > > > well, but why would you want to compare interpreted java with python? > > > > Well for one, it'd be nice to be a little closer to comparing apples to > > apples (how fast a VM can interpret and execute the bytecodes). > > Somewhat valid point (IMO that is) > > >Secondly, > > I was very suprised that, with a JIT, Java was only meagerly faster than > > Python. > > Well, python is written in c or something equivalent right? Yes, the Python VM is written and C. And what do you think the Java VM is written in? > > was curious to know how slow Java was without the JIT. Finally, even > > though Java and Python are wildly different in many ways, knowing the > > interpreted vs. JIT'ed speeds might give a little insight into the > > potential benefits of a Python JIT. > > I don't really know if python needs a jit, it would probably not harm > python, but is it really worth the effort? Heehee... that's the whole reason I asked my question in the first place. -Dave
- Previous message (by thread): Code Reviews (was: Defending the Python lanuage...)
- Next message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list