Why Python is like BASIC (and why this is a good thing)
Dan Bishop
danb_83 at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 16 15:40:49 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Feb 16 15:40:49 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Why Python is like BASIC (and why this is a good thing)
- Next message (by thread): Why Python is like BASIC (and why this is a good thing)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piet van Oostrum <piet at cs.uu.nl> wrote in message news:<wzadu9scs2.fsf at nono.cs.uu.nl>... > >>>>> rmunn at pobox.com (Robin Munn) (RM) writes: > > RM> Reading the first few chapters of _How to Think Like a Computer > RM> Scientist_ (http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/thinkCSpy/ for those who haven't > RM> heard of this book), I was struck by how Python resembles BASIC in some > RM> ways that make it a very good language for teaching: > > BASIC a very good language for teaching???? > Well, it depends on what you want to teach, I guess. Everyone should learn BASIC. It's the perfect example of how *not* to design a programming language :-)
- Previous message (by thread): Why Python is like BASIC (and why this is a good thing)
- Next message (by thread): Why Python is like BASIC (and why this is a good thing)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list