XP (was Re: Defending the Python lanuage... )
Graham Ashton
graz at mindless.com
Tue Feb 12 03:22:16 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 12 03:22:16 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Defending the Python lanuage...
- Next message (by thread): XP (was Re: Defending the Python lanuage... )
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:09:49 +0000, Thomas R. Corbin wrote: > The XP folks say that just adopting part of XP just isn't as efficacious > as doing the whole thing because each piece supports the other pieces. > > Of course, they also say, "season to taste". Ron Jeffries says it's an ideal, which is almost never achieved: http://www.xprogramming.com/xpmag/Misconceptions.htm >From which I quote: XP says that "all production code is written by two people sitting together at one machine". That's the rule. As far as I know, no project has ever done that, including many that I consider to deserve the name XP. So what's the rule about? It's an ideal. Ron seems to be a bit of a wheel in the XP world too. -- Graham
- Previous message (by thread): Defending the Python lanuage...
- Next message (by thread): XP (was Re: Defending the Python lanuage... )
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list