calling a function indirectly
Rajarshi Guha
rxg218 at psu.edu
Wed Feb 20 14:46:55 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 20 14:46:55 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): calling a function indirectly
- Next message (by thread): calling a function indirectly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 01:24 in comp.lang.python Jeff Hinrichs wrote: > If you wanted to get away from the dangerous eval, you could put your > functions inside of a class and then, Why is eval dangerous? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha | email: rajarshi at presidency.com 417 Davey Laboratory | web : http:// www.jijo.cjb.net Dept. Of Chemistry | ICQ : 123242928 Pennsylvania State University | AIM : LoverOfPanda ------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Fingerprint: DCCB 4D1A 5A8B 2F5A B5F6 1F9E CDC4 5574 9017 AF2A Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- There is no truth to the allegation that statisticians are mean. They are just your standard normal deviates.
- Previous message (by thread): calling a function indirectly
- Next message (by thread): calling a function indirectly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list