Pythonic bit twiddling
Jim Richardson
warlock at eskimo.com
Fri Feb 22 18:48:41 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 22 18:48:41 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Pythonic bit twiddling
- Next message (by thread): fork problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 22 Feb 2002 01:07:51 -0800, Paul Rubin <phr-n2002a at nightsong.com> wrote: > Jim Richardson <warlock at eskimo.com> writes: >> Thanks, this isn't a bad idea (I am not really python guru, so am easily >> overwhelmed sometimes :) I will have to think on it. Speed isn't much of >> an issue, as the data is only 9600 and each packet needs a checksum, and >> usually, only 8-10 packets a second. >> Another reply mentioned a "byte" operator, but I can't find that >> anywhere in my python docs. Is it something not in the default setup? > > That was me. There's no byte operator. I was using 'byte' as a > variable name to denote an integer variable that held an 8-bit number. > Sorry for the confusion. Ah, that explained it, you assumed I was competent python programmer, and failed to read my mind. all your fault :) -- Jim Richardson Anarchist, pagan and proud of it www.eskimo.com/~warlock Linux, for when you need to get work done, Or you could just play UT...
- Previous message (by thread): Pythonic bit twiddling
- Next message (by thread): fork problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list