Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
Bill Tate
tatebll at aol.com
Fri Feb 1 08:23:28 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 1 08:23:28 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Next message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bryan <bryan at eevolved.com> wrote in message news:<crl68.1346$dz5.287185 at weber.videotron.net>... > Bill Tate wrote: > > > Bryan, > > Very interesting stuff. Do you have numbers for Java 1.3.x - just > > curious to see if there were major gains between 1.3 and 1.4? > > Unfortunately I don't have the time to do so, but I encourage you to. I > hope Glyph will post my results on his site, his seem very skewed in light > of new python and java developments. I'll give it shot - I'll post when I get it done. Some of the Jython comments are starting to peek my interest as well. Thanks again for the info.
- Previous message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Next message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list