[Slightly-OT] Wasn't Google supposed to be "avid Python-Users" ?
Boris^2
borcis at geneva-link.ch
Thu Feb 7 17:40:18 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 7 17:40:18 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): [Slightly-OT] Wasn't Google supposed to be "avid Python-Users" ?
- Next message (by thread): [Slightly-OT] Wasn't Google supposed to be "avid Python-Users" ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robin Becker wrote: > > I think there are good compilers for lisp which can be a very dynamic > language so in principle it's not the dynamic nature of python that > prevents native compilation. Wouldn't a first step be optional type declarations ? Boris
- Previous message (by thread): [Slightly-OT] Wasn't Google supposed to be "avid Python-Users" ?
- Next message (by thread): [Slightly-OT] Wasn't Google supposed to be "avid Python-Users" ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list