functional programming with map()
Joshua Muskovitz
joshm at taconic.net
Sun Feb 24 22:41:55 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Feb 24 22:41:55 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): functional programming with map()
- Next message (by thread): functional programming with map()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I know that > map(f,items) > is equivalent to: > for x in items: > f(x) Actually, map does more than that. map returns the results of f(x) as a new list, of the same length as the original items. If f() returns no value, then you get a list of Nones. >>> map(string.upper, ['dfbdfg','sdfgberg','dfbsadg','dfbdfag']) ['DFBDFG', 'SDFGBERG', 'DFBSADG', 'DFBDFAG'] > But what is the functional equvalent of: > > for x in items: > x.f() List comprehensions make easy work of this: >>> [ x.upper() for x in ['dfbdfg','sdfgberg','dfbsadg','dfbdfag'] ] ['DFBDFG', 'SDFGBERG', 'DFBSADG', 'DFBDFAG'] so in your example, "[ x.f() for x in items ]". Cool, eh? -- # Joshua Muskovitz # joshm at taconic.net def lyyrs(sig): return '-'.join(sig.split()+["ly y'rs"]) lyyrs('Hire me! I need the work!') -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
- Previous message (by thread): functional programming with map()
- Next message (by thread): functional programming with map()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list