Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
brueckd at tbye.com
brueckd at tbye.com
Fri Feb 1 10:38:38 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 1 10:38:38 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Next message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Bryan wrote: > > I'm still not willing to give java the benefit of the doubt yet. > > Agreed. The test suites are rather limited in nature. I would welcome the > results of a more in-depth analysis. However, the trollish nature of my > post and resulting low number of replies leads me to believe no one can or > is willing to really back up any claims to the contrary. That's why I asked whether or not the JIT was enabled in the tests and, if so, if you could re-run them without it. Maybe the low number of replies is because it's not suprising that a semi-compiled-to-native program is faster? -Dave
- Previous message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Next message (by thread): Java vs Python Benchmarks: Java is faster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list