Adding static typing to Python
Justin Sheehy
justin at iago.org
Tue Feb 19 14:45:57 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 19 14:45:57 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Adding static typing to Python
- Next message (by thread): Adding static typing to Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ajeru at vknn.org (Alexander Jerusalem) writes: > And the final argument I have for static type checking is that it > enables method dispatching based on parameter types. In a statically > typed language you can create two methods that have the same name but > differ on the parameter types. The correct method will be called for > you depending on the type of the argument you pass in your call. That > makes for a quite flexible way of extending a program. You can just > add another method with the same name and another type to handle a > special case without touching the existing methods. I use parametric polymorphism quite a bit in languages like Java. However, Python allows you to do something that is often even better, which wouldn't work at all with forced static typing: signature-based polymorphism. (I know that there is a better term for this, but I can't think of it right now.) Instead of dispatching on an object's type, you dispatch on its capabilities. Sometimes this dispatch is implicit via a method call. The encouragement of this pattern is a very strong point for Python, imo. -Justin
- Previous message (by thread): Adding static typing to Python
- Next message (by thread): Adding static typing to Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list