JavaScript considered harmful (was Re: New online index to Beazley's tutorials)
Alex Martelli
aleax at aleax.it
Tue Jan 8 06:24:23 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jan 8 06:24:23 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): JavaScript considered harmful (was Re: New online index to Be azley's tutorials)
- Next message (by thread): JavaScript considered harmful (was Re: New online index to Beazley's tutorials)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Aahz Maruch" <aahz at panix.com> wrote in message news:a1dh2o$3am$1 at panix3.panix.com... ... > While you have a point in some senses, campaigning against JavaScript -- > particularly poor usage of JavaScript -- is always a Good Thing. See > http://www.rahul.net/aahz/javascript.html Yes *BUT* -- on that page, you also claim: "the big problem with using cookies is that many people use multiple browsers on multiple machines; if you're going to solve that problem, you might as well skip cookies in the first place." To which I answer, "oh yeah?". Typical case: a site on which you can 'log in' with a username and password (not a very original concept, is it?), in order e.g. to get a customized page already tailored to your 'favourites' whatevers. The obvious problem: visitors find it irksome to have to type the username and password on each site-visit in order to get at the nifty customization features. We need some client-side state to ameliorate this. That's basically what cookies are FOR, no matter what paranoia many people choose to attach to them as 'anti-privacy devices'. When, and only when, a user visits the site from a new browser or machine (or a machine/browser/user combination he or she shares and from which he or she wasn't the most recent visitor to the site), then the user will enter username and password. That's a tiny fraction of site visits from "regulars", so "the big problem" just isn't one. So how might I "as well skip cookies in the first place" in this utterly TYPICAL scenario? Only by NOT offering regulars the convenience of automatic-access to their favourites-settings. NOT a halfway sensible tradeoff. I'd like to recommend your page to help wean JS addicts off their horrid vice, but I can't do that with a clear conscience as long as the page contains that anti-cookies snippet... Alex
- Previous message (by thread): JavaScript considered harmful (was Re: New online index to Be azley's tutorials)
- Next message (by thread): JavaScript considered harmful (was Re: New online index to Beazley's tutorials)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list