waterfall (was Re: REPOST: Re: Book "python programming patterns". anybody read this??)
brueckd at tbye.com
brueckd at tbye.com
Mon Jan 7 15:51:05 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jan 7 15:51:05 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): waterfall (was Re: REPOST: Re: Book "python programming patterns". anybody read this??)
- Next message (by thread): Problem with callbacks from C to Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7 Jan 2002, Andrew Kuchling wrote: > "John Roth" <johnroth at ameritech.net> writes: > > Unfortunately, that's the way Government projects work. Until > > Isn't that the way all projects, government or not, work? I remember > horrifying numbers quoted in places such as Robert Glass's column in > Comm. of the ACM to the effect that 50% (or maybe it was 60%, or 90%) > of projects fail by either not producing a deliverable, or producing > a deliverable that doesn't work, or by producing a working deliverable > that doesn't solve the problem. I don't know about all projects in general, but for "large" projects (ones that were planned to take a year or more to create) the number was much closer to 90% than 50%. Worse, the majority of both successes and failures tend to be way over budget too. -Dave
- Previous message (by thread): waterfall (was Re: REPOST: Re: Book "python programming patterns". anybody read this??)
- Next message (by thread): Problem with callbacks from C to Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list