Semantic analysis of one response (was Re: Autocoding project proposal.)
Courageous
jkraska at san.rr.com
Sat Jan 26 20:13:38 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jan 26 20:13:38 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Semantic analysis of one response (was Re: Autocoding project proposal.)
- Next message (by thread): Semantic analysis of one response (was Re: Autocoding project proposal.)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>I think Timothy has an idea that would make computers >much easier to use, but he's making one or more of the following >mistakes: You forgot: "Not realizing that many of the denizens of these newsgroups are computer scientists engaged in active research efforts of various kinds, including research into the field of computer science per se, and that coming to this table with an attitude of superiority and without at least somewhat having investigated the prior art is more than a little bit of a mistake." Try working in a real scientific discipline for a while and making the mistake of reporting a possible discovery early only to later disappoint all involved. _That_ won't be a mistake that one makes twice, believe me. Which brings the snake back around quite properly to its tail. That's what I was trying to say in my prior message. In the field of "new, innovative, and world-changing-class discoveries and devices" a lot of prudence and a lot of "show me!" are required. C//
- Previous message (by thread): Semantic analysis of one response (was Re: Autocoding project proposal.)
- Next message (by thread): Semantic analysis of one response (was Re: Autocoding project proposal.)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list