efficient idiomatic queue?
Raymond Hettinger
othello at javanet.com
Thu Jan 17 08:46:36 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jan 17 08:46:36 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): efficient idiomatic queue?
- Next message (by thread): efficient idiomatic queue?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Delaney, Timothy" <tdelaney at avaya.com> wrote in message news:mailman.1011232764.16285.python-list at python.org... > > 10000 <type 'list'> 0.329070 > 10000 <type 'array'> 0.234557 > 10000 DictIntFifo 0.123809 > 10000 DictLongFifo 0.185284 > 10000 ListPrependFifo 0.329698 > 10000 ListAppendFifo 0.398269 > > 100000 <type 'list'> 76.195043 > 100000 <type 'array'> 56.828019 > 100000 DictIntFifo 1.269020 > 100000 DictLongFifo 1.961017 > 100000 ListPrependFifo 60.693928 > 100000 ListAppendFifo 77.094517 > > So once you get to decently large quantities in the queue, the dict versions > make real sense over a basic list (Win2000). > > Tim Delaney Before drawing a conclusion on this one, please add Sébastien Keim's approach to the mix: class NestedListFifo: def __init__(self): self.first=[] def append(self,data): node = [data,[]] if self.first == []: self.first= node else: self.last[1] = node self.last = node def pop(self, n=-1): node = self.first self.first=node[1] return node[0] Raymond Hettinger
- Previous message (by thread): efficient idiomatic queue?
- Next message (by thread): efficient idiomatic queue?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list