Unit tests and random.Random()
Tim Peters
tim.one at home.com
Thu Jan 10 23:02:41 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jan 10 23:02:41 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Unit tests and random.Random()
- Next message (by thread): Platform-independent GUID creation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Danil]] > ... > Is there an official position on how code should be written to guarantee > that it gets a WH generator[1]? No, not even a guarantee that there always *will* be a way to get a WH generator. It's mounds better than the C library's rand(), but falls increasingly behind the reasonable state of the art. > And where should I have looked to find this answer for myself? You had already figured that out yourself, so I'd say you looked in the right places.
- Previous message (by thread): Unit tests and random.Random()
- Next message (by thread): Platform-independent GUID creation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list