pickle performance on larger objects
Paul Rubin
phr-n2002b at NOSPAMnightsong.com
Wed Jul 17 18:43:35 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jul 17 18:43:35 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): pickle performance on larger objects
- Next message (by thread): pickle performance on larger objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sam Penrose <spenrose at intersight.com> writes: > On a recent project we decided to use pickle for some quick-and-dirty > object persistence. The object in question is a list of 3,000 > dictionaries > whose keys and values are short (< 100 character) strings--about 1.5 > megs worth of character data in total. Loading this object from a pickle > using cPickle took so long we assumed something was broken. What happens (besides losing cross-version portability) if you use marshal instead of pickle?
- Previous message (by thread): pickle performance on larger objects
- Next message (by thread): pickle performance on larger objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list