XML overuse? (was Re: Python to XML to Python conversion)
Jeremy Bowers
newfroups at jerf.org
Fri Jul 12 11:00:21 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 12 11:00:21 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): XML overuse? (was Re: Python to XML to Python conversion)
- Next message (by thread): XML overuse? (was Re: Python to XML to Python conversion)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli wrote: > It is -- easily. My pet peeve is the idea of using XML files for > tasks that obviously need a real database, preferably a relational one. > > I think some people never really GOT relational databases, no matter > that they've been around for decades and are so widespread, and they're > now turning to *overusing* XML to cover up for that:-). This was the idea in the core of my point. Databases are far more powerful then any XML library I've ever seen... not counting the XML databases, I suppose, which don't seem to be in the common use that relational databases are (and I don't know much about, except $$$). Don't decide on XML until you've eliminated relational databases, for instance. (In an experienced engineer's head, that elimination can be instantaneous, based on the knowlege and experience of the engineer. In a new programmer, it may take actual thinking.) Indeed, relational databases are almost as cross-platform and cross-language as XML is! But if you *need* transferability and extensibility, you'll probably end up with XML. Databases don't just sit on a file system or get forwarded in email very well.
- Previous message (by thread): XML overuse? (was Re: Python to XML to Python conversion)
- Next message (by thread): XML overuse? (was Re: Python to XML to Python conversion)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list