Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!
Bryan Olson
fakeaddress at nowhere.org
Sun Jul 28 02:33:47 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jul 28 02:33:47 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!
- Next message (by thread): Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli wrote: > Steve Holden wrote: Alex Martelli had written: >>>The poster is typically nonplusses that all buttons print 'fum'. >>> >> >>I would be nonplussed if that code even *compiled*, given that "print" is >>a keyword and lambda takes an expression not a statement. > > > Right - you caught my little trap. I don't regret using it, though, > because it DID catch a couple of lambda-lovers... First, who do you think you're kidding? It was your mistake not your trap. Second, this question is better answered by people who actually understand use of lambda. [...] > I think the reason why Guido suggests it's a wart is that it IS a wart. > > Sure, backwards compatibility mandates lambda stay, but I think it's > worth emphasizing that it's there ONLY for backwards compatibility, > and using def is better. The mistake was limiting lambda to expressions. --Bryan
- Previous message (by thread): Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!
- Next message (by thread): Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list