squared functions--most Pythonic way?
Giorgi Lekishvili
gleki at gol.ge
Fri Jun 28 04:38:18 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jun 28 04:38:18 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): squared functions--most Pythonic way?
- Next message (by thread): squared functions--most Pythonic way?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
One of the biggest advantages of Python is its nice and elegand mixture of procedural, OO and functional programming... I would prefer lambda stile as the most concise, but it is a matter of personal "phylosophy";) Grtz, Giorgi Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > functional programming: > > > > # with an internal named function > > def fsquare(f): > > def f2(x): > > return f(x)**2 > > return f2 > > > > this seems to be the most pythonic (lambda is not the preferred approach > usually). > > Of course someone will mention taking this to the next step with a compose() > function which take f(x) and g(x).
- Previous message (by thread): squared functions--most Pythonic way?
- Next message (by thread): squared functions--most Pythonic way?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list