PEP 285: Adding a bool type
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Sun Mar 31 01:48:40 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Mar 31 01:48:40 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message (by thread): PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Hansen wrote: > Agreed on that point. "bool" would be less clear to newcomers and > possibly those with limited English. (Vague assumption there that > those people might have heard of Boolean algebra but might not > link it to the shorter form as quickly.) > > Besides, if we're doing this to look like the other languages, > don't they use "boolean" more often? (I realize that's not > really the reason for doing this.) C++ uses bool, C99 uses _Bool, Java uses boolean ... I can see both ways here. I'm more used to seeing bool, but wouldn't object to boolean. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, US / 37 20 N 121 53 W / ICQ16063900 / &tSftDotIotE / \ Nationalism is an infantile sickness. \__/ Albert Einstein Alcyone Systems' Daily Planet / http://www.alcyone.com/planet.html A new, virtual planet, every day.
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message (by thread): PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list