MySQL questions
Alex Martelli
aleax at aleax.it
Wed May 8 02:35:10 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed May 8 02:35:10 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): MySQL questions
- Next message (by thread): MySQL questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gerhard Häring wrote: > Billy Ng wrote in comp.lang.python: >> [MySQL doesn't do subselects] >> I notice the subselect will be in version 4 > > That would be version 4.1. And also according to > > http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_Introduction.html#TODO > > I'll have to wait for MySQL 5.0 for it to be comparable feature-wise > to what PostgreSQL offers today. The assessment at 1.9.2 on that same webpage seems reasonable: "If you need raw speed, MySQL Server is probably your best choice. If you need some of the extra features that only PostgreSQL can offer, you should use PostgreSQL". (Interestingly, MySQL has a BSD-like, "core-developers- group" cathedral-like approach, while PostgreSQL is closer to the "bazaar" approach -- judging from just the products, I could have guessed the other way 'round.) I'm biased, probably because I never really had to push the scalability limits of a database: I'm not sure I could live without subselects and views, in particular, and stored procedures, triggers, atomic multi-table updates, etc, are all very useful, so, I lean towards PostgreSQL. But I can well imagine somebody just needing to push lots and lots of data very fast without any such niceties might lean the other way. Alex
- Previous message (by thread): MySQL questions
- Next message (by thread): MySQL questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list