Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
John Baxter
jwbaxter at spamcop.net
Mon Nov 11 11:53:28 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Nov 11 11:53:28 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Next message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <7h3lm402zq5.fsf at pc150.maths.bris.ac.uk>, Michael Hudson <mwh at python.net> wrote: > Carl Banks <imbosol at vt.edu> writes: > > > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > > > As I recall, they also derive from the hardware that LISP was > > > first > > > implemented on -- C)ontents A)ddress R)egister, and C)ontents D)ata > > > R)egister (or some variation thereof). Something to the effect that the > > > original machine storage unit (words) effectively held two pointers, > > > accessed as address and data... > > > > > > Which is kind of funny. You'd expect the Data Register to point to > > the nth item in the list, and Address Register to point to the next > > cons cell. But the reverse is true. > > I think the d in cdr stands (stood) for decrement, not data. But the > web seems confused on the issue. It just means "second half of cons > cell" to me... It was "decrement" in IBM's view of the machine, and in the usage of those instructions which had the field. --John
- Previous message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Next message (by thread): Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list