Why is Python a good first scripting language?
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Mon Oct 21 09:41:38 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 21 09:41:38 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Why is Python a good first scripting language?
- Next message (by thread): Why is Python a good first scripting language?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
news at agapow.net (Paul-Michael Agapow) wrote: > Ruby is cool and solid, but the developer community is still > small. It's at the point where Python was 3 or 4 years ago. I find it fascinating that people who know neither Python nor Ruby seem th think Ruby is the cooler language. We've got one hot-shot C++/Java guy here who refuses to even try Python because he can't get his head past the indentation issue and because Python's flavor of OO doesn't match his conception of what OO should be. But, he keeps saying things like, "If I were to learn a scripting language, I'd learn Ruby". At the other end of the spectrum, we had another guy here who only qualified to be called a programmer because he rode the dot-com craze where anybody who could get a 20-line Perl script to run was called a programmer. He also knew neither Ruby or Python, but insisted that Ruby was the way to go, even if his analysis was no deeper technically than "Python blows, Ruby rules". If Perl is to Python as Windows is to Macintosh, then I guess Python is to Ruby as Macintosh is to BeOS :-)
- Previous message (by thread): Why is Python a good first scripting language?
- Next message (by thread): Why is Python a good first scripting language?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list