Why functional Python matters
Tj
tj_scarlet at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 23 21:03:40 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Apr 23 21:03:40 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Why functional Python matters
- Next message (by thread): Why functional Python matters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hmm, must be sleepy because I could have sworn that you wrote that you asked him this question, not Tom Christiansen. Tj tj_scarlet at yahoo.com (Tj) wrote in message news:<ccc7084.0304231430.6b81effb at posting.google.com>... > mjd at plover.com (Mark Jason Dominus) wrote in message news:<b86lc3$tnd$1 at plover.com>... > > I don't believe that's correct. At an early Open Source Conference, > > perhaps around 1998 or so, I was present at a conversation between > > Guido and Tom Christiansen. Tom asked Guido why Python didn't have > > closures, and Guido's reply (and I think this is an exact quote) was > > "Closures aren't important." > > > > I remember it because I was so astonished by the obtuseness of the answer. > > Well, it seems the burden of proof is on you. Please explain the > usability advantages of closures vs. Python's current scope system.
- Previous message (by thread): Why functional Python matters
- Next message (by thread): Why functional Python matters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list