Rekall Binary
root
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Wed Dec 31 16:04:06 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Dec 31 16:04:06 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PYTHONPATH unnecessary with PythonWin?
- Next message (by thread): Rekall Binary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It looks like TotalRekall sells the GPL version for 15 pounds: http://www.totalrekall.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=CCart&id=16 Which seems in keeping with: "...small charge for Rekall binary distributions to cover our costs" By the way, it's still not clear how strong a busness model it is to give away GPL software and expect to make money off services. Have you seen what RedHat is now doing? In any case, I don't think there is anything wrong with charging more than distribution costs for a binary version of GPL'd program. Creating binaries that work on various versions of various platforms and providing a nice installer for them is quite a bit of work. Also, the GPL is about freedom: not cheap software. The idea is that it a good thing for all involved for users to have access to source code. That is very different than providing inexpensive software for folks that can't figure out how to compile something (or can't be bothered). Those folks will not be contirbuting to the p[roject, and will not be using the code in their own projects. That being said, I'm very happy that I can get so much open source software in nicely packaged binary (or easy to compile) form. I only contribute to a VERY SMALL fraction of all the free software I use. -Chris
- Previous message (by thread): PYTHONPATH unnecessary with PythonWin?
- Next message (by thread): Rekall Binary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list