What GUI toolkit looks the best?
Cameron Laird
claird at lairds.com
Thu Dec 11 11:55:37 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 11 11:55:37 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): What GUI toolkit looks the best?
- Next message (by thread): What GUI toolkit looks the best?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <vth78mea92j65e at news.supernews.com>, John Roth <newsgroups at jhrothjr.com> wrote: . . . >And that is what is called a "real good question." I believe that >you're supposed to be able to use the Tk libraries without using >TCL, but the people that wrote Tkinter weren't able to make it >work. I don't, however, know this for a fact, it's just something >that's bouncing around the old synapses... . . . It's a choice. Perlites tried both ways, and largely settled on Perl/Tk, which uses the Tcl-free C bindings. It's much, MUCH easier maintaining a Tcl-coded applica- tion, though, so Tkinter pops out a couple of hours after a new Tk release, while Perl/Tk takes months of calendar time. Guido certainly has the ability to do a low-level binding to Tk (and I know someone did, on an experimental basis, in the mid-'90s--was that he?); he chooses to invest his time elsewhere. There's actually more to it than that. These are the right highlights, though, to the best of my knowledge. -- Cameron Laird <claird at phaseit.net> Business: http://www.Phaseit.net
- Previous message (by thread): What GUI toolkit looks the best?
- Next message (by thread): What GUI toolkit looks the best?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list