UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Sun Dec 21 10:59:50 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Dec 21 10:59:50 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice
- Next message (by thread): UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <vub5e9cgp2rk54 at news.supernews.com>, John Roth <newsgroups at jhrothjr.com> wrote: > >I'm not likely to do that for two reasons. One is that, at this point >in my life, I'm not a C programmer. I don't even have a functional C >compiler on my machine. The other is that I don't particularly like >the notion of adding more and more options to the mix. I'm much more >concerned with the social issue of how software development is done, >and another variation on a good idea simply isn't my way of approaching >the issue. That's why ``import this`` is about the only good answer you'll get. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.
- Previous message (by thread): UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice
- Next message (by thread): UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list