__import__ confusion
Justin Ng
justin.ng at NOSPAMdspfactory.com
Tue Feb 25 13:43:54 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 25 13:43:54 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Dr. Dobb's Python-URL! - weekly Python news and links (Feb 24)
- Next message (by thread): __import__ confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:41:04 -0300, Leazen <leazen at uol.com.ar> wrote: > I'm having some trouble understanding how __import__ works. > From the docs I read that "from spam.ham import eggs" results in > "__import__('spam.ham', globals(), locals(), ['eggs'])" rendering the > later function call 'eggs', what ever that is, but I actually get 'ham'! It seems to be that in the particular example you're talking about, the docs state: "Note that even though locals() and ['eggs'] are passed in as arguments, the __import__() function does not set the local variable named eggs; this is done by subsequent code that is generated for the import statement." The implication from the docs seems to be that __import__ does not mimic the import statement, but the import statement uses __import__ and additional code to perform what you expect of it. Justin Ng
- Previous message (by thread): Dr. Dobb's Python-URL! - weekly Python news and links (Feb 24)
- Next message (by thread): __import__ confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list