ternary operator vote
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Wed Feb 12 11:08:05 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 12 11:08:05 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): ternary operator vote
- Next message (by thread): ternary operator vote
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <yu99heb9lfuo.fsf at europa.research.att.com>, Andrew Koenig <ark at research.att.com> wrote: > >Electionmethods.org argues at some length that allowing votes other >than "yes" and "no" without otherwise changing the system does not >make the system more fair in any useful sense. As an alternative, >it proposes "Condorcet voting", which allows people to vote by >rank ordering rather than just yes/no. While technically accurate, because this isn't *just* a vote in the traditional sense, but more like a poll, I believe that using YES/NO/ABSTAIN produces more information, so that people can vote for proposals they like, against proposals they hate, and skip the others. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Register for PyCon now! http://www.python.org/pycon/reg.html
- Previous message (by thread): ternary operator vote
- Next message (by thread): ternary operator vote
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list