Erik Max Francis max at alcyone.com
Sun Feb 9 16:43:20 EST 2003

• Previous message (by thread): why not extending the syntax for classes, too ?
• Next message (by thread): why not extending the syntax for classes, too ?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

holger krekel wrote:

> Erik Max Francis wrote:
>
> > Because it means renaming what?
> 
> the function or class name?
> 
>     class checker as tracer:
>         ...

I'm still totally confused as to how choosing "as" is renaming anything.
We're talking about a syntax that is not yet introduced to the language.
So if in the proposal "is" is changed to "as," nothing is actually
changing, since nothing exists yet.  Right?

-- 
 Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ Life is an effort that deserves a better cause.
\__/ Karl Kraus
    Alcyone Systems / http://www.alcyone.com/
 Alcyone Systems, San Jose, California.

---

• Previous message (by thread): why not extending the syntax for classes, too ?
• Next message (by thread): why not extending the syntax for classes, too ?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list