PEP 308: Pep Update
Anders J. Munch
andersjm at inbound.dk
Thu Feb 27 17:31:03 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 27 17:31:03 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Sheila King" <usenet at thinkspot.net> wrote: > I really do love the list comprehensions, myself. They are handy for a lot > of the email header and filtering type of scripts that I write. > > I didn't find the example you posted confusing at all. It's just a nested > for-loop. Yes, I know. Except that the innermost part of the nested loop, which would be at the very end in a regular for-loop, is at the very beginning. If that has never bothered you, good for you. For me, that was the one part of Python that wasn't immediately obvious. People have been implying throughout the PEP 308 debate that mixing up the evaluation order is fine because of the analogy with list comps. I accept the analogy but draw the opposite conclusion from it. Pop quiz: What is the value of this alternate universe list comprehension expression? [for x in (1,2): for y in (-1,+1): x*y] - Anders
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list