PEP 308 - suggestion for generalising the ternary operator
Bengt Richter
bokr at oz.net
Sat Feb 15 01:37:02 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Feb 15 01:37:02 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308 - suggestion for generalising the ternary operator
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308 - suggestion for generalising the ternary operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:24:14 -0500, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: [...] >I am becoming increasingly sympathetic to that view. But I don't know >what I will think three days from now. LOL & QOTW/308 ;-) Regards, Bengt Richter
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308 - suggestion for generalising the ternary operator
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308 - suggestion for generalising the ternary operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list