PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
Samuele Pedroni
pedronis at bluewin.ch
Mon Feb 10 18:04:47 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 10 18:04:47 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Michele Simionato" <mis6+ at pitt.edu> ha scritto nel messaggio news:mailman.1044911539.4202.python-list at python.org... > I hate the idea of spending the next week sending 100 postings to > convince people than > "when" is better than "if", if already the majority doesn't want the > ternary operator > in any form (and maybe this is the case; or maybe not, I don't know) The debate is already going circular. Half-joking: I could vote no just because I had to suffer the debate <.5 wink> And if it goes longer ... Many on the pro-camp are crystallizing toward the proposal they like, I would vote no just to avoid the risk of some of them. And BTW we are essentially not discussing new functionality.
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list