PEP 308: Pep Update
Tim Rowe
tim at remove_if_not_spam.digitig.co.uk
Fri Feb 21 10:01:48 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 21 10:01:48 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> This is not a new proposal; `C ? x, y' has already been suggested very > early on in these threads. `C ? x, D ? y, z' would simply be the > "relaxed" (as you called it) extension to it. Sorry I've come to this late, but has anybody already pointed out that practically every C/C++ coding standard (certainly /all/ I've ever seen) deprecates the use of the ?: ternary operator, because it's infamous for producing unmaintainable code?
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list