PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Tue Feb 11 03:15:33 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 11 03:15:33 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Next message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Rubin wrote: > Andrew, I keep wondering why you post these statistics. I gather the > low frequency of conditional expressions (CE's) in code that you > examine is supposed to be some kind of evidence that they're not > useful all that frequently. However, empirically, whether they're > useful frequently or not, they're useful often enough that people keep > asking about them and we get these endless threads. _And_ the broken alternatives get used in the standard library in _Python_ code! This isn't an abstract matter of "Gee, what if," the deficient alternatives _are_ being used, even by seasoned Python programmers. And, as we've all seen from Andrew Koenig's example, cause bugs. In the standard library. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE / \ There I was / There I was / Splitting atoms with my desire \__/ Lamya Computer science / http://www.alcyone.com/max/reference/compsci/ A computer science reference.
- Previous message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Next message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list