For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Sean Ross
sross at connectmail.carleton.ca
Sat Feb 8 12:14:24 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Feb 8 12:14:24 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> ... I would be willing to abstain from (or possibly even vote for) a > proposal that reads left-to-right *and* doesn't muck with the if > statement. So far, the only proposals that work on those grounds are > > <cond> ? <exp1> : <exp2> > > and > > when <cond> then <exp1> else <exp2> > -- > Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ > > Register for PyCon now! http://www.python.org/pycon/reg.html I like the latter best, but then, of course, this introduces _two_ new keywords.(which doesn't bother me, but it'll bother others). <exp1> when <cond> else <exp2>, may not read strictly left to right(although, to me, it does), but it only introduces one new keyword(which may prove less anathemic) Either 'when' version would be fine by me. <cond>?<exp1>:<exp2>, for purely aesthethic reasons, I don't care for as much, but it is familiar. Sean
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list