For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Paul Moore
gustav at morpheus.demon.co.uk
Sun Feb 9 07:25:38 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Feb 9 07:25:38 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> writes: > He should keep repeating it. Because it's an example of why, without a > conditional operator, people who want one will resort to constructs that > are less readable and potentially inherently flawed. I've seen a few posts by now getting the proposed conditional expression the wrong way round. Maybe this proves that it's simply hard to think correctly in terms of conditional expressions, and they should not be used (and hence, that language support for them should be rejected). Or maybe we just need to move on, and make new points, or give up. Paul. -- This signature intentionally left blank
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list