For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Tue Feb 11 02:08:35 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 11 02:08:35 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Koenig wrote: > In my grammar proposal, I'm defining it that way: Any statement that > begins with "if" is an if-statement, not an if-expression treated > as a statement. This is also my proposal. The so-called Corner Case is unimportant and it's perfectly fine if it's rejected. That means the addition of the conditional operator, but no changes to how statements (particularly if statements) are handled. if C: x else: y as a standalone statement would be an error, because the parser would think you're starting a statement, not a conditional operator. If that's really what you meant, put it in parentheses, or write it as a true if...else statement. > I'm skeptical that this is possible, but if you can figure out a way > to > do it, that would be fine with me. Same here. I'm pretty much ambivalent about the Corner Case; the path of least resistance is leaving it illegal, which is fine with me. There's no ambiguity here, there's no changes to existing grammar. One new, unambiguous type of expression involving a conditional operator is added; that is all. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE / \ There I was / There I was / Splitting atoms with my desire \__/ Lamya Computer science / http://www.alcyone.com/max/reference/compsci/ A computer science reference.
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list