PEP 308: Pep Update
Robin Becker
robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk
Fri Feb 28 04:02:01 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 28 04:02:01 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <slrnb5t590.2ng3.Gareth.McCaughan at g.local>, Gareth McCaughan <Gareth.McCaughan at pobox.com> writes >Robin Becker wrote: > >> If we base everything on a 12 year old's understanding/ability we'll get >> a dumbed down language which is unsuitable for serious programming. > >I fail to see how adding something to Python can turn it into >a dumbed-down language unsuitable for serious programming, >no matter how oversimplified or verbose or primitive or >otherwise horrible the addition is. All those serious programs >already written in Python will go on working just fine if >any of the proposed conditional expression forms is introduced. > I'm not claiming that adding any particular scheme/addition is doing that. I claim that those who base their arguments on teachability to non-programmers may be doing that. Many don't like lambda, map etc because they are hard to teach/understand, the argument is then made that such constructs should be deprecated and finally removed despite the fact that they are useful in some circumstances. -- Robin Becker
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Pep Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list