PEP 308: Yet another syntax proposal.
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Tue Feb 18 23:54:06 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 18 23:54:06 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Yet another syntax proposal.
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Yet another syntax proposal.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Foley wrote: > What makes you think Python doesn't already have "special forms"? > Someone else said that recently, too. When people are referring to "special forms" with regards to Python, surely they're talking about things that look like normal function calls but don't always evaluate their arguments; e.g., the PEP 308 proposal involving cond(C, x, y) where it supports short circuiting. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE / \ There's this perfect girl / Someone no one can see \__/ Lamya Kepler's laws / http://www.alcyone.com/max/physics/kepler/ A proof of Kepler's laws.
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Yet another syntax proposal.
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Yet another syntax proposal.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list