PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
Laura Creighton
lac at strakt.com
Tue Feb 11 01:26:09 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 11 01:26:09 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> >>>I have no objection to "straw man" votes, so long as they do not end > >>>the debate. > >> > >> I'm not familiar with that term in this context. Did you mean "straw > >> poll"? > > > >Yes. > > > > From my experience many, many years ago on the ANSI X3J11 standards > >committee, when discussing new features, the leaders called for non-binding > >"straw votes" frequently to help move the discussion forward. It's a way to > > >quickly table identifiable dead-ends and help pare down otherwise impossible > > >lists of alternatives. > > What I'd be curious about at this point is how everyone breaks down > between: > > 1) I don't want conditional expressions added to python with any > syntax > 2) I don't necessarily object to conditional expressions, but I don't > like and wouldn't support any syntax proposed so far > 3) I'm in support of PEP 308 as written, but I wouldn't support any of > the other proposed syntaxes > 4) I'd support PEP 308 as written, and I prefer it to any of the > proposed alternatives, but I could support some of the alternatives > as well > 5) I would prefer one of the proposed alternate syntaxes to the > original PEP, but if it comes down to just yes/no on PEP 308, I > would vote yes > 6) I would support one or more of the proposed alternate syntaxes, but > not PEP 308 as written > > This can be looked at in a few interesting ways: > > 1-2: don't want anything suggested so far > 3-4: want PEP 308 as written > 5-6: want one of the alternate proposals > > 1-2,6: would vote no on PEP 308 as written > 3-5: would vote yes on PEP 308 as written > > 1-3: wouldn't support any of the alternate syntaxes > 4-6: would support at least one alternate syntax > > However, starting a new poll whenever someone is curious is a good way > to drown out any useful information and dilute the chance of running > the polls that would really be useful. But if others think this would > be a useful poll, go ahead and run it and I'd love to see the results. > > -Dave > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list you need to add: 7) I don't care Laura
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list