Cameron Laird claird at lairds.com
Thu Feb 27 11:46:28 EST 2003

• Previous message (by thread): Perl Vs Python
• Next message (by thread): Perl Vs Python
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

In article <x7isv5u35c.fsf at guru.mired.org>, Mike Meyer  <mwm at mired.org> wrote:
			.
			.
			.
>other people will consider a weak point. So the real answer is, as has
>been suggested here, try them both and see.
			.
			.
			.
AND, in this particular case, Python and Perl are
sufficiently lightweight in a particular sense
that it is reasonable to try them both and experience
them for yourself.  They're cheap to install and
exercise.  This is in marked contrast to, say, C++,
Java, Ada, CLOS, ... where you might invest several
years before you are sure whether they fit your own
mentality.
-- 

Cameron Laird <Cameron at Lairds.com>
Business:  http://www.Phaseit.net
Personal:  http://phaseit.net/claird/home.html

---

• Previous message (by thread): Perl Vs Python
• Next message (by thread): Perl Vs Python
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list