Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?
Jason Smith
chastel_pelerin at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 6 19:54:58 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 6 19:54:58 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?
- Next message (by thread): Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Alex > but, it's not a deep and desperate need anyway (I do not know > of any case where I'd suffer a BIG loss of productivity if it > was impossible to change an object's type on the fly, _IF_ > the whole system uses signature-polymorphism as below). "signature" polymorphism is the same as "explicit" bounded quantification over types? i.e. haskell, forall a.b => a -> [String] -> b etc...instead of letting the static inferencing take over..? [snip C++ Templates] I was under the impression that C++ templates were nothing more then a macro hack by the preprocessor, though I would love to hear otherwise..? please fill me in... Thanks heaps... J.
- Previous message (by thread): Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?
- Next message (by thread): Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list